Tag Archives: M&A

Perspectives On Brazilian Mergers And Acquisitions

According to the São Paulo Industries Federation (FIESP), Brazilian investment rate for 2014 will be lower than 18% of the GDP, which in turn is lower than 2013 figures. The investment rate decline may be explained by the poor results of the Brazilian economy during the year of 2014 which are continuously impacting investors’ confidence in the country’s development outlook. Despite the reduction in the investment rate, the volume of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in 2014 has increased according to data gathered by PwC which is analyzed throughout this article. There may be good reasons to believe that the M&A market will continue to be active in 2015, but a significant change in the direction of the Brazilian economy and the legal framework will determine whether one should expect less or more interest in Brazil in the coming years.

The volume of M&A transactions up to the third quarter of 2014 has increased at an approximate rate of 10% compared to the average of the last years. Market sources expect that such growth will be sustained until year close or may even exceed such percentage. The sectors that lead the ranking in volume of transactions, include IT, services and retail, but it is key to extend an analysis of the Brazilian M&A environment in relation to the agribusiness and infrastructure sectors due to their role in the economy and increasing demands. The majority of the deals had the participation of strategic investors but as, in recent years, private equity and other financial investors became a relevant player and important source of funding.

The IT sector led the way and was responsible for about 17% of the total number of transactions reported until the third quarter of 2014. The relevant participation of the IT sector may be explained by the need for consolidation felt in this market, a trend which will most likely continue in 2015.

On the opposite direction, services and retail sectors, which are also relevant in the number of transactions, are maintaining or even reducing their share in the total volume of 2014. One may further expect a decrease in volume of transactions for the next years in view of the challenges these sectors are already facing and of the low pace of growth of the economy and consumption in 2014.

The agribusiness sector is the big star of the Brazilian economy for the year of 2014. Despite the rest of the economy is going down (GDP growth is expected to be at a rate around 0,2%-0,3% in 2014), the Brazilian agribusiness sector is expected to grow 4% in relation to 2013. This sector will continue to be relevant in the coming years in terms of M&A activity, despite some adjustments that may be imposed on the ethanol industry which will certainly go through more consolidation and financial restructuring during the year of 2015.

Investment in infrastructure will be key to obtain a sustainable growth of the Brazilian economy. Infrastructure in industries and sectors such as oil and gas, energy, telecommunications, mining, hydro ways, ports, airports, railroads and roads are highly dependent on a fairly stable legal framework. The legal framework for many of these sectors has been highly unstable in the last years. Despite the lack of interest for long term investments in many of these sectors, existing assets continue to be attractive to investors, especially assets that will benefit from the continuous growth of the agribusiness sector and increasing demands by the population in relation to urban mobility. M&A may be a tool for consolidation of some of these industries and an aid for many of them to face the financial challenges of projects already contracted but not necessarily, or properly, funded.

In terms of players involved in M&A deals, the economic slowdown tends to affect more of the short term investors rather than strategic players looking with a long term view. However, short or medium term players such as private equity and other financial investors may actually look into Brazil as an opportunity given the devaluation of the Brazilian currency and the reduction of price expectation by Brazilian sellers.

Many of these M&A growth drivers (consolidation in certain sectors, importance of agribusiness, additional infrastructure requirements and financial restructuring) will continue to result in a significant volume of transactions but this volume will not be sustainable if the Brazilian macro-economic environment is not adjusted and the country does not offer stability to investors in its legal framework. M&A growth is not an alternative for an increasing need of growth in the investment rate ― more M&A deals do not necessarily lead to more investment and ― without more investment, the Brazilian economy will not find its path to growth again.

Finding The Right Buyer For Your Company

One of the first things that business owners and executives who are thinking about selling their company (or a division thereof) consider is who might be the right buyer for their company, where to find them, and how to get them engaged in meaningful discussions.

Characteristics of the Right Buyer

While it’s usually not possible to determine the single “right” buyer for a company, there are certain characteristics that make certain prospective buyers better than others.

Strategic fit. The seller should determine how their company fits with the buyer’s longer-term strategy and objectives. This is accomplished through a combination of research and a dialogue with the buyer’s representatives. Lack of a strategic fit will reduce the likelihood the buyer will be motivated to consummate a transaction, or that they will only do so at a low value. Conversely, a strong strategic fit will help the buyer in justifying a higher price and more attractive terms. In some cases, the buyer will reveal specific synergies that it expects to realize as a result of the transaction, which can help the seller in highlighting those benefits. Ideally, synergies should be in the form of incremental revenues rather than purely cost savings. As a general rule, buyers tend to be more amenable to paying a premium for revenue-based synergies.

Decision-maker involvement. If a buyer is committed to acquiring a company, they should be involving key decision-makers at a relatively early stage of the sale process, including during the course of management presentations and negotiations with the seller. This helps ensure that the proposed acquisition has the necessary internal support, and avoids a situation where those negotiating the deal are unable to influence senior management about the merits of the transaction. While it’s often necessary for the buyer’s representatives to obtain support from their senior management team or board of directors, the seller should be satisfied that those involved in the discussions have the necessary authority to recommend the transaction and influence the ultimate decision-makers.

Financial capacity to transact. Buyers should be able to demonstrate that they have the ability to consummate a transaction with available cash or credit facilities. A transaction that is contingent upon the buyer’s ability to obtain financing adds further risk to the seller that the deal may not close. Alternatively, a buyer that is not able to raise adequate financing may look for deferred payment mechanisms such as promissory notes and earn-out arrangements, which make the transaction less attractive to the seller from an economic value standpoint. If the seller is unsure about a buyer’s ability to finance a transaction (e.g. the buyer is a relatively small private company), the seller should request a comfort letter or similar documentation from the buyer’s financing sources prior to executing a letter of intent.

Relative size. As a general guideline, the right buyer for a particular company is one that is between about 5x and 20x larger than the seller’s company, in terms of revenues and profitability. Where the buyer is not much larger than the seller, it can be difficult for them to raise sufficient capital to consummate a transaction without relying on promissory notes or other deferred types of consideration. Further, a buyer may perceive a relatively large acquisition as being high-risk, which could reduce the likelihood that they will transact, or that they will look for a lower price to compensate for that risk. On the other hand, a buyer that is much larger than the seller’s company may lose interest because the seller’s financial results will not “move the needle” for them on a consolidated basis, absent there being a highly strategic reason for undertaking the transaction (e.g. the seller’s company has proprietary technology that the buyer can significantly leverage in its existing operations).

353292a

Experience at completing transactions. It’s usually preferable to deal with a buyer that has a track-record of completed transactions. This is because buyers that have consummated one or more transactions in the past will have better established procedures and a better idea of what to expect. Conversely, dealing with a buyer that is looking at its first transaction will have a greater learning curve, which could cause delays and place the closing at greater risk.

Where to Find the Right Buyer

There are numerous possibilities for where the right buyer may be found. While direct competitors are obvious choices, they are often not the right buyer. This is because direct competitors normally focus on cost-reduction type synergies, which they are less likely to pay for. Furthermore, dealing with direct competitors provides them with access to sensitive information about the seller’s operations. While a non-disclosure agreement might protect the seller against blatant misuse of confidential information, there is still a risk that some confidential information may be exploited in more subtle ways (e.g. where it influences the buyer’s pricing strategy for common customers).

More often, the right buyer is one that views the seller’s employees, customers, or product and service offerings (e.g. brand name; technology; and so on) as a platform for revenue growth (so-called “platform buyers“). Platform buyers are more likely to retain the seller’s employees, and possibly offer them greater opportunities for career and personal advancement. This can facilitate the transition of the business and reduce the risk for both the buyer and the seller.

Complementary product and service offerings that offer cross-selling opportunities are a good example of revenue-type synergies that a platform buyer might perceive. From the buyer’s perspective, the ability to cross-sell can help entrench their relationship with both existing customers and new customers by offering a more diverse product or service selection.

In other cases, a platform buyer is attracted to the seller’s company because it offers geographic expansion, which can provide the buyer with both revenue growth and diversification (i.e. risk reduction). The ability to attract a buyer from another geographic region varies depending on the size and nature of the business. As a practical matter, most Canadian companies are sold to Canadian buyers (or a subsidiary of a foreign entity that has an existing presence in Canada). Given Canada’s vast geography, many buyers that have an established presence in one region of the country find that corporate acquisitions are the best means of inter-provincial expansion.

Not surprisingly, the most common foreign buyers for Canadian companies are those based in the U.S., who find that Canada is a natural extension to their U.S. presence. Attracting a buyers from Europe, Asia or other regions outside of North America (who do not have existing operations in Canada) typically is more challenging. In most cases, buyers from these regions are only interested where the seller’s company is a sizable entity or possesses proprietary technology or other assets that can be leveraged on a global basis. Furthermore, the seller should anticipate that buyers from far-reaching regions will proceed more slowly than those based in North America, due to the learning curve, internal logistics and possible cultural differences.

Finally, consideration should be afforded to platform buyers that are existing customers or suppliers of the company that may be looking to expand through vertical integration (sometimes referred to as “supply chain analysis”). Caution is warranted however to approach these parties carefully, so as not to disrupt the seller’s existing business relationship.

A helpful exercise for sellers and their investment banker to undertake when considering the right buyer for their company is to think about is as follows:

353292b

 

Engaging the Right Buyer

Engaging the right buyer for a company is somewhat of an art. Rarely are these organizations attracted by general mass media solicitations (e.g. email blasts). Rather, for each buyer, the seller and their investment banker to consider why that buyer might be interested in acquiring the company (i.e. the strategic fit and possible synergies). Advanced research is required in this regard, which includes publicly available information (e.g. the buyer’s website and news releases) as well as an analysis of previous transactions those buyers have undertaken.

Before approaching prospective buyers, it is important for the seller to ensure that their company is ready for sale, and that it represents an attractive acquisition target. Sellers only have one chance to make a good first impression. It is difficult (and the seller is in a less favourable negotiating position) where the seller must retract from the sale process to clean up their organization, and re-engage a prospective buyer at a later date.

It is also important to approach the right individual(s) within the prospective buyers’ organization. This should be an individual(s) who understands the strategic direction of their company, can champion the potential acquisition and who has the authority within their organization to consummate (or at least recommend) the transaction.

Finally, the seller and their investment banker must closely manage the sale process to ensure that the right prospective buyers remain engaged, and to convey information in a manner that will help the buyer realize the strategic value of the acquisition opportunity.